Need for greater use by the United Nations and its organs of the International Court of Justice
- Author: UN General Assembly
- Document source:
-
Date:
14 November 1947
II. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED ON THE REPORTS OF THE SIXTH COMMITTEE
171. Need for greater use by the United Nations and its organs of the International Court of Justice
A
The General Assembly, Considering that it is a responsibility of the United Nations to encourage the progressive development of international law; Considering that it is of paramount importance that the interpretation of the Charter of the United Nations and the constitutions of the specialized agencies should be based on recognized principles of international law; Considering that the International Court of justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations; Considering that it is also of paramount importance that the Court should be utilized to the greatest practicable extent in the progressive development of international law, both in regard to legal issues between States and in regard to constitutional interpretation, Recommends that organs of the United Nations and the specialized agencies should, from time to time, review the difficult and important points of law within the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice which have arisen in the course of their activities and involve questions of principle which it is desirable to have settled, including points of law relating to the interpretation of the Charter of the United Nations or the constitutions of the specialized agencies, and, if duly authorized according to Article 96, paragraph 2, of the Charter, should refer them to the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion.B
Under Article 96, paragraph 2, of the Charter, the General Assembly is empowered to authorize other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies to request advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities. The Trusteeship Council, as one of the principal organs of the United Nations, and in view of the functions and powers conferred upon it by Chapters XII and XIII of the Charter, should be authorized to request advisory opinions on legal questions arising within the scope of its activities. The General Assembly, therefore, Authorizes the Trusteeship Council to request advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice on legal questions arising within the scope of the activities of the Council.C
The General Assembly, Considering that, in virtue of Article 1 of the Charter, international disputes should be settled in conformity with the principles of justice and international, law; Considering that the International Court of Justice could settle or assist in settling many disputes in conformity with these principles if, by the full application of the provisions of the Charter and of the Statute of the Court, more frequent use were made of its services,1. Draws the attention of the States which have not yet accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court in accordance with Article 36, paragraphs 2 and 5, of the Statute, to the desirability of the greatest possible number of States accepting this jurisdiction with as few reservations as possible;
2. Draws the attention of States Members to the advantage of inserting in conventions and treaties arbitration clauses providing, without prejudice to Article 95 of the Charter, for the submission of disputes which may arise from the interpretation or application of such conventions or treaties, preferably and as far as possible to the International Court of Justice;
3. Recommends as a general rule that States should submit their legal disputes to the International Court of Justice. Hundred and thirteenth plenary meeting,14 November 1947.
This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.