|Campaign Update, January 2021 - March 2021|
G v G  UKSC 9
This case concerned the application of the Hague Convention on child abduction and UK asylum law. The court concluded that a child cannot be removed by a Hague Convention order until after a final determination on the principal applicant's asylum claim.
19 March 2021 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Supreme Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Abduction | Countries: South Africa - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the case G. v. G.|
|Campaign Update, October 2020 - December 2020|
|Citizenship and Statelessness in the Member States of the Southern African Development Community|
|The Minister of Home Affairs and Others v Jose and Another (169/2020)  ZASCA 152 (25 November 2020)|
|Campaign Update, April 2020 - June 2020|
|Campaign Update, January 2020 - March 2020|
|Campaign Update, October 2019 - December 2019|
A E Applicant and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HELEN JOSEPH HOSPITAL et al Respondents
In Part A the Applicant seeks in substance that first, second and third Respondents be interdicted from refusing to administer emergency healthcare to her whilst in Part B the Applicant seeks an order declaring that fifth and sixth Respondents policy of refusing placement of a asylum seekers and or refugees into the chronic renal treatment programme, kidney analysis, kidney and renal transplant to be inconsistent with the Bill of Rights in the constitution.
7 October 2019 | Judicial Body: South Africa: High Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Right to health - Right to life | Countries: Ethiopia - South Africa