Last Updated: Friday, 26 May 2017, 12:39 GMT

Case Law

Case Law includes national and international jurisprudential decisions. Administrative bodies and tribunals are included.
Filter:
Showing 1-5 of 5 results
TE (Eritrea) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

On appeal from the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AS/00526/2007).

11 March 2009 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Complementary forms of protection - Deportation / Forcible return - Effective remedy - Residence permits / Residency - Visas | Countries: Eritrea - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

TG (Central African Republic) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

On appeal from the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT No. AA/14610/2006).

15 July 2008 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Effective remedy - Right to family life | Countries: Central African Republic - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

The Queen (on the Application of Mazin Mumaa Galteh Al-Skeini and Others) v. The Secretary of State for Defence

On appeal from the Administrative Court Division Court Rix LJ and Forbes J [2004] EWHC 2911 (Admin)

21 December 2005 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Effective remedy | Countries: Iraq - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

R (on the application of Rashid) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

On appeal from the Administrative Court.

16 June 2005 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Asylum policy - Changes of circumstances in home country - Effective remedy - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Kurd | Countries: Iraq - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation

Application for judicial review. The Court held that when assessing a discretionary decision made by a public authority, the court would only interfere with the decision where it was so unreasonable that no other authority could ever have come to it.

10 November 1947 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Effective remedy - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search Refworld