Last Updated: Friday, 15 December 2017, 16:28 GMT

Case Law

Case Law includes national and international jurisprudential decisions. Administrative bodies and tribunals are included.
Selected filters: Costa Rica State protection
Filter:
Showing 1-4 of 4 results
Chinchilla v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

20 April 2005 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Topic(s): Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - SGBV - State protection | Countries: Canada - Costa Rica

Chinchilla c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)

20 April 2005 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Topic(s): Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - SGBV - State protection | Countries: Canada - Costa Rica

Decision TA0-15870 (Revoked Jurisprudential Guide (2011), In Private)

Dates of hearing (in private): 12 November 2002 and 27 March 2003.

"Jurisprudential Guides" are decisions which articulate policy through the application of the law set out in a decision of the Board to the specific facts of another individual case before a decision-maker. The application of a Jurisprudential Guide is not mandatory. However, decision-makers are expected to apply Jurisprudential Guides in cases with similar facts or provide reasoned justifications for not doing so.

31 March 2003 | Judicial Body: Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada | Topic(s): Effective protection - Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) - Persecution on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity - Social group persecution - State protection | Countries: Canada - Costa Rica

Decision TA2-14980 (Revoked Jurisprudential Guide (2011), In Private)

Date of hearing (in private): 11 March 2003.

"Jurisprudential Guides" are decisions which articulate policy through the application of the law set out in a decision of the Board to the specific facts of another individual case before a decision-maker. The application of a Jurisprudential Guide is not mandatory. However, decision-makers are expected to apply Jurisprudential Guides in cases with similar facts or provide reasoned justifications for not doing so.

20 March 2003 | Judicial Body: Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada | Topic(s): Effective protection - Social group persecution - State protection | Countries: Canada - Costa Rica

Search Refworld