|UNHCR Urged to Prevent Refugee Joournalist's Expulsion from UAE|
Urteil E-6220/2006 vom 27. Oktober 2011
This decision by the Federal Administrative Court updates the Court's decision of 14 February 2008 (Tribunal administratif fédéral ATAF 2008/2). It states that political opponents, critical journalists, human rights activists, critical NGO representatives, as well as victims of or witnesses to serious human rights violations and persons who are presumed to have close contacts to the LTTE represented groups are still at risk of persecution in Sri Lanka. In general, returns to Sri Lanka including the East and North are considered reasonable, with the exception of Vanni region where no returns should take place. For persons who left the northern province some time ago, the existence of social network and chances for securing minimal living conditions should be considered.
27 October 2011 | Judicial Body: Switzerland: Tribunal administratif fédéral | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Involuntary repatriation - Rejected asylum-seekers | Countries: Sri Lanka - Switzerland
CB (Detailed Appraisal) Sri Lanka v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
This determination was subsequently replaced by <a href="?docid=46b9d3a32&page=search">LP (LTTE Area - Tamils - Colombo - Risk?) Sri Lanka CG  UKAIT 00076</a>.
16 May 2002 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Involuntary repatriation - Rejected asylum-seekers | Countries: Sri Lanka - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|Sri Lanka: Information on forced repatriation of Sri Lankans who were living in England in 1988|