Last Updated: Friday, 22 August 2014, 12:56 GMT

Freedom of the Press - Pakistan (2003)

Publisher Freedom House
Publication Date 30 April 2003
Cite as Freedom House, Freedom of the Press - Pakistan (2003), 30 April 2003, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/473450cfc.html [accessed 22 August 2014]
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

Status: Partly Free
Legal Environment: 17
Political Influences: 25
Economic Pressures: 16
Total Score: 58

Population: n/a
GNI/capita: n/a
Life Expectancy: 63
Religious Groups: Sunni Muslim (77 percent) Muslim (20 percent), Christian, Hindu, and other (3 percent)
Ethnic Groups: Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashtun, Baloch
Capital: Islamabad

The constitution and other laws authorize the government to curb freedom of speech on subjects including the constitution, the armed forces, the judiciary, and religion. Concern was raised that three ordinances adopted in August – the Press Council Ordinance, the Registration Ordinance, and the Defamation Ordinance – will further restrict freedom of expression. During the year, Islamic fundamentalists and thugs hired by feudal landlords continued to harass journalists and attack newspaper offices. On several occasions, journalists were also subjected to physical attacks by police and political activists. The kidnap and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl by Islamic militants in early 2002 focused international attention on the dangers of reporting in Pakistan. While journalists practice some self-censorship, the independent press continues to present outspoken and diverse viewpoints. However, President Pervez Musharraf appeared to have become less tolerant of criticism. In March, editor Shaheen Sehbai resigned under pressure and left the country after The News published a story on the links between Pearl's killers and official intelligence agencies. He and his family continued to face legal harassment throughout the year. Other prominent editors also complained of receiving threats from intelligence agencies. Nearly all broadcast media are state-owned, and coverage favors the government.

Copyright notice: © Freedom House, Inc. · All Rights Reserved

Search Refworld

Countries