Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae
Interventions before courts by UNHCR and other organizations are an important tool through which protection standards can be developed and a consistent application of refugee law fostered. Interventions before courts may take different forms, depending on the national or supranational context, including formal amicus curiae briefs, advisory opinions or letters to the court or parties involved, as well as public statements. Interventions by UNHCR are carried out in the exercise of its supervisory function.
Refworld is the repository of all interventions made by UNHCR in judicial proceedings before national and regional courts. They are organised in reverse-chronological order and, where available, are linked to the court decision in the case(s) at hand once adopted.
Refworld is the repository of all interventions made by UNHCR in judicial proceedings before national and regional courts. They are organised in reverse-chronological order and, where available, are linked to the court decision in the case(s) at hand once adopted.
Selected filters: China
Filter:
Showing 1-2 of 2 results
|
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Huang; Kashmiri v. Secretary of State for the Home Department - Written Submissions on Behalf of Liberty
14 February 2007 | Publisher: Liberty | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae |
|
Brief of the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies in the case of Xu-, Xin- v Ashcroft before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
21 January 2003 | Publisher: Center for Gender & Refugee Studies | Document type: Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae |
