Title	Skeleton Argument on Behalf of the Intervener (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), in the Court of Appeal (C/2002/0751) on Appeal from the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, between Amer Mohammed El-Ali (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
Publisher	UN High Commissioner for Refugees
Author	Prof. G. Goodwin-Gill in cooperation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Department of International Protection and BO London
Publication Date	26 June 2002
Country	United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Occupied Palestinian Territory
Topics	1951 Refugee Convention | International protection | Persons not in need of international protection
Related Document	Amer Mohammed El-Ali v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Daraz v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department (The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Intervener)
Cite as	UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Skeleton Argument on Behalf of the Intervener (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), in the Court of Appeal (C/2002/0751) on Appeal from the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, between Amer Mohammed El-Ali (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), 26 June 2002, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3d1c73c04.html [accessed 19 May 2013]
Comments	Amicus curiae brief on specific aspects of the interpretation of Article 1D of the 1951 Convention, which was submitted by UNHCR to the Court of Appeals in London on 26 June. This brief was prepared by Professor Guy Goodwin-Gill in cooperation with BO London and DIP.