Refworld | China: 1. Is it conceivable that a letter such as that said to have been sent by the applicant's brother could have been sent from a detention/re-education facility? 2. Is the place mentioned in the receipt and in the letter as the location/address of the applicant's brother a detention/re-education facility?

Title	China: 1. Is it conceivable that a letter such as that said to have been sent by the applicant's brother could have been sent from a detention/re-education facility? 2. Is the place mentioned in the receipt and in the letter as the location/address of the applicant's brother a detention/re-education facility?
Publisher	Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal
Publication Date	31 August 2006
Country	China
Topics	Criminal justice \| Falun Gong
Citation / Document Symbol	CHN30482
Cite as	Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal, China: 1. Is it conceivable that a letter such as that said to have been sent by the applicant's brother could have been sent from a detention/re-education facility? 2. Is the place mentioned in the receipt and in the letter as the location/address of the applicant's brother a detention/re-education facility?, 31 August 2006, CHN30482 , available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4b6fe153d.html [accessed 24 May 2013]
Comments	This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum.
Disclaimer	This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.