Last Updated: Thursday, 17 April 2014, 13:11 GMT

Attacks on the Press in 2011 - India

Publisher Committee to Protect Journalists
Publication Date 22 February 2012
Cite as Committee to Protect Journalists, Attacks on the Press in 2011 - India, 22 February 2012, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4f4cc98bc.html [accessed 19 April 2014]
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

Key Developments

  • Impunity in journalist murders fosters further anti-press violence.

  • Authorities nationwide allege antistate activity to justify media harassment.

Although the motives remained unconfirmed in late year, the murders of Chhattisgarh's Umesh Rajput and Mumbai crime reporter Jyotirmoy Dey reminded colleagues of the risk of violence. India remained on CPJ's Impunity Index, a ranking of countries in which journalists are murdered regularly and authorities fail to solve the crimes. Violent clashes between insurgents and government forces in states such as Kashmir challenged reporters' ability to work. In a mid-year report, The Hoot, a media issues website, recorded nine journalist assaults between January and May, including four in Orissa, where industrialization and Maoists had each displaced local residents. Authorities retaliated against critical reporting with antistate charges: Two journalists were jailed for allegedly supporting rebels after they criticized the impact of anti-Maoist campaigns on civilians. Journalists who exposed police ineptitude and corruption faced jail time. Politicians and businessmen muzzled reporters with legal action, including defamation, which authorities failed to decriminalize. Internet penetration was relatively low but growing, prompting the government to pass regulations that could suppress online dissent.

[Refworld note: The sections that follow represent a best effort to transcribe onto a single page information that appears in tabs on the CPJ's own pages, which also include a number of graphics not readily reproducible here. Refworld researchers are therefore strongly recommended to check against the original report: Attacks on the Press in 2011.]


Impunity Index ranking, 2011: 13th

Seven murders from the past decade remain unsolved, making India one of the worst countries in the world at combating deadly anti-press violence, CPJ's Impunity Index showed.

CPJ's 2011 Impunity index:

1. Iraq
2. Somalia
3. Philippines
4. Sri Lanka
5. Colombia
6. Afghanistan
7. Nepal
8. Mexico
9. Russia
10. Pakistan
11. Bangladesh
12. Brazil
13. India


Imprisoned on December 1, 2011: 2

Freelancer Lingaram Kodopi documented anti-Maoist violence by police in Chhattisgarh. Mumbai magazine editor Sudhir Dhawale criticized Chhattisgarh's anti-insurgent militia. Both journalists awaited trial in late year on retaliatory charges.

Caught between insurgents and police:

2: Relatives of Kodopi hospitalized in Chhattisgarh during 2011 – one after being beaten in police custody, one after being shot by Maoists, according to Frontline magazine.

88: Books belonging to Dhawale that police confiscated without a warrant to demonstrate Maoist sympathies, according to his supporters, who say he was framed.

7: Nights in detention spent by Ahongsangbam Mobi, vice president of the All Manipur Working Journalists Union, on a charge of belonging to the banned Kangleipak Communist Party. In fact, Mobi had negotiated with party militants over journalist safety issues, news reports said.


Killed in Kashmir since 1992: 10

The state's historically poor press freedom record declined again after violence contesting Indian rule during the summer of 2010 brought tighter government restrictions.

A chokehold on coverage:

5,000: Subscribers to an SMS news service that were affected when a June 2010 government blockage was extended into 2011. Officials later reinstated non-journalistic SMS services.

5: Kashmir newspapers denied government advertising for "anti-national" riot coverage, India Today reported.

0: Journalists interviewed in February by the weekly Tehelka who said police had honored curfew passes allowing them to report during times of restricted movements.

5: Journalists covering protests who were assaulted or detained by authorities in August and November – Al-Jazeera contributor Showkat Shafi both times.

2: Journalists refused entry. U.S.-based Alternative Radio's David Barsamian, known for his analyses of Kashmir, was turned back at New Delhi airport; and Gautam Navlakha, editorial consultant of Economic and Political Weekly, was sent home to New Delhi from the summer capital, Srinagar.


Pledges to decriminalize defamation: 2

In January, M. Veerappa Moily, minister of law, and in February, Ambika Soni, minister of information and broadcasting, promised journalists that decriminalization was forthcoming. It did not materialize in 2011.

A range of legal attacks:

1: Night in jail spent by Prabhatkiran cartoonist Harish Yadev after Muslims took offense to his drawing of a politician. Prabhatkiran said the politician instigated the complaints, Hindustan Times reported.

6: Gujarat police who summoned journalist Rahul Singh to court in January for tampering with evidence. Singh had exposed a mass grave of 2002 Gujarat riot victims, Open magazine reported.

5: Days in detention spent by Tarakant Dwivedi under the Official Secrets Act after he detailed faulty weapons storage in a Mumbai Mirror article.


Blocked websites: 11

Two U.S.-based news sites, Indymedia and IndyBay, were among those that Bangalore's Center for Internet and Society found had been blocked domestically in April. Critics said new regulations banning ill-defined "harmful" online content could increase censorship.

Flourishing Internet, creeping control:

88 million: Internet users in India in 2010, according to the International Telecommunication Union. By late 2011, the government said the figure had topped 100 million.

68: Government takedown requests to Google, seeking the removal of online content. Google complied with 51 percent of the requests, its Transparency Report said.

36: Hours allowed under new regulations for service providers to remove content after receiving a complaint from authorities, The Wall Street Journal reported. Failure to take down content is punishable by fines or jail time.

Copyright notice: © Committee to Protect Journalists. All rights reserved. Articles may be reproduced only with permission from CPJ.

Search Refworld

Countries