Last Updated: Thursday, 24 July 2014, 13:56 GMT

Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal

The Refugee Review Tribunal is a statutory body which provides a final, independent, merits review of decisions made by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship or, in practice, by officers of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC), acting as delegates of the Minister, to refuse to grant protection visas to non-citizens within Australia, or to cancel protection visas held by non-citizens in Australia. The Tribunal was established in 1993 under Part 7 of the Act and replaced the Refugee Status Review Committee (RSRC). Website: www.mrt-rrt.gov.au/
Selected filters: China
Filter:
Showing 71-80 of 466 results
China: 1. What is the reported attitude of the authorities in Chengdu and/or Sichuan to family/house churches and in particular, to junior and non-proselytising members of those churches? 2. Are there any reports suggesting that attitudes towards family/house churches have hardened since the pro-democracy protests in China in February 2011?

9 August 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

China: 1. Are there any reports of mass arrests of Falun Gong practitioners in Shandong Province in late July 1999? 2. Is there any information about No. 34 Mingshi Road's legal education centre in Qingdao City (e.g. location, uniforms, staff, size, routines)? 3. Is there any information about Director Wang Hongjun (e.g. age, appearance, and role)?

5 August 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

China: 1. Deleted. 2. Please provide information relating to relevant laws and procedures for the demolition of buildings in Tianjin, including relocation and compensation issues. Please also comment on the relevant avenues of appeal available to disgruntled residents affected by demolitions and any mistreatment of persons pursuing such appeals. 3. Please provide information relating the petition system generally in China, particularly in Tianjin, as well as information relating to mistreatment of petitioners. 4. Please provide information about the age that children in Tianjin normally complete secondary school. 5. Please provide information relating to the 'China Disabled People Union', including its locations and functions. 6. Please provide information relating to detention procedures in Tianjin. 7. Please provide information relating to exit and re-entry procedures in China, including the treatment of persons with an adverse political profile, such as someone actively petitioning against a property re-development. 8. Please provide information relating to the availability of false documents in China, particularly in Tianjin and in relation to property dispute documents

5 August 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

RRT Case No. 1104110

3 August 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law

RRT Case No. 1103558

29 July 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law

RRT Case No. 1010720

7 July 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law

RRT Case No. 1103329

7 July 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law

China: 1. Is there any information about the frequency of forced sterilisation and contraception in Guangdong Province? 2. Is there any information about what age would be considered in Guangdong to be of childbearing age and therefore subject to forced sterilisation and/or contraception?

29 June 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

China: 1. XUAR is an autonomous region. Does the one-child policy apply in XUAR? 2. Is it possible to transfer household registration from Fujian to XUAR?

24 June 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

China: 1. Are there reports of farmers' protests or deputations in Fujian between September 2009 and June 2010; or of a farmers' demonstration on 30 June 2010 in Fuzhou? 2. If no to Q1, is this strong evidence that no demonstration occurred, or is it possibly consistent with government censorship and the claim being true? 3. Which laws now govern compensation for confiscation of farm land in Fujian province, and what should be the calculation for compensation of farmland in Fujian province -is it under the 2007 Property Law of the PRC, or the 1999 or 2007 laws mentioned in Tribunal country advice CHN37490? 4. Are there reports of the government's response to demonstrations against confiscation of land; or to demonstrations outside offices equivalent to the People's Congress?

24 June 2011 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld