Attacks on the Press in 2011 - Saudi Arabia
|Publisher||Committee to Protect Journalists|
|Publication Date||22 February 2012|
|Cite as||Committee to Protect Journalists, Attacks on the Press in 2011 - Saudi Arabia, 22 February 2012, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4f4cc97f32.html [accessed 14 March 2014]|
|Disclaimer||This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.|
Vast repression grows more restrictive with media law amendments.
Sensitive to unrest, government obstructs protest coverage.
Saudi authorities maintained a suffocating atmosphere of censorship as they further tightened the country's highly restrictive media law. In May, a royal decree amended five articles of the law, barring the publication of any material that contravened Sharia law, impinged on state interests, promoted foreign interests, harmed public order or national security, or enabled criminal activity. In January, the kingdom issued new regulations for online media that included several restrictive and vaguely worded provisions that grant the Ministry of Culture and Information sweeping powers to censor news outlets and sanction journalists. The government withdrew the accreditation of Riyadh-based Reuters correspondent Ulf Laessing in March, apparently angered by his coverage of a pro-reform protest. Reuters stood by the reporting. The same month, amid popular uprisings across the region, authorities banned three critical columnists working for the government-controlled daily Al-Watan. Authorities did not cite a reason, but all three had written about the region's political unrest. In late year, as demonstrations broke out in the kingdom's eastern province, authorities blocked local and international journalists from gaining access to the region. With a few exceptions, the demonstrations went uncovered.
[Refworld note: The sections that follow represent a best effort to transcribe onto a single page information that appears in tabs on the CPJ's own pages, which also include a number of graphics not readily reproducible here. Refworld researchers are therefore strongly recommended to check against the original report: Attacks on the Press in 2011.]
Worst nation for bloggers: 5th
CPJ has ranked Saudi Arabia among the 10 Worst Countries to Be a Blogger, based on the country's restrictive laws and the government's practice of blocking hundreds of thousands of websites.
Global ranking on CPJ's Worst Blogging Nation survey:
Minimum age: 20
Article 5 of new online regulations issued in January required operators of all news websites to obtain a license. Licenses were subject to several restrictive conditions: Saudi citizenship, a minimum age of 20 years, a high school degree, and "good conduct." The new regulations subject online media to the kingdom's highly repressive press law, CPJ research shows.
The regulations contain several other restrictive clauses:
Article 7: Editors-in-chief of online newspapers must be approved by the Ministry of Culture and Information.
Article 12: Online licenses may be revoked at the government's discretion.
Article 19: Online publications must provide the ministry with their hosting information.
Requests to block websites: 672,000
In July, the Communication and Information Technology Commission said Saudi officials and individuals had requested the government block a total of 672,000 websites in 2010. The commission characterized most as focused on pornography, gambling, and drugs, but CPJ research shows that authorities also blocked numerous human rights and news websites.
Censorship milestones, 2011:
July 25: The kingdom blocked Amnesty International's website after the organization's criticism of an anti-terror bill that could stifle peaceful protest. The site was accessible again in late year.
August 4: Authorities blocked access to the Lebanese news website Al-Akbar for its reporting on Saudi intervention in the Bahrain uprising, according to the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information.
August 12: Radio Netherlands reported that its website was blocked after it released a report on migrant worker abuse in the kingdom.
Internet penetration: 41%
Despite the heavy online censorship exercised by the government, Saudi Arabia has about 11.4 million Internet users, according to the International Telecommunication Union.
Internet penetration in the Gulf region:
UAE: 78 percent
Saudi Arabia: 41
Fine in Saudi riyals: 1 million
With the May amendments to the media law, first-time violators could face fines of 500,000 Saudi riyals (US$135,000), while second-time offenders could draw a 1 million riyal (US$270,000) fine and a potential ban on working, according to CPJ research. Syria also adopted a media law in 2011 that was portrayed as reform but continued to impose punitive measures for critical reporting.
Other regional measures, passed and pending:
Syria: With a new law passed in August, journalists could face fines up to 1 million pounds (US $21,000) for vaguely defined violations such as coverage that harmed "national unity and national security," according to CPJ research.
Jordan: Under a bill passed by the lower house of parliament in September, journalists could face fines of up to 60,000 dinars (US$84,600) for publishing news about corruption "without solid facts," CPJ research shows. The proposal was pending in late year.