| Title | Januzi (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Hamid (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Gaafar (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Mohammed (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) (Consolidated Appeals) |
| Publisher | United Kingdom: House of Lords (Judicial Committee) |
| Author | House of Lords |
| Publication Date | 15 February 2006 |
| Country | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Sudan |
| Topics | Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) |
| Citation / Document Symbol | [2006] UKHL 5 |
| Related Document | (1) Hamid, (2) Gaafar and (3) Mohammed (Appellants) v. the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Intervener). Case for the Intervener |
| Cite as | Januzi (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Hamid (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Gaafar (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Mohammed (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) (Consolidated Appeals), [2006] UKHL 5, United Kingdom: House of Lords (Judicial Committee), 15 February 2006, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/43f5907a4.html [accessed 19 June 2013] |
| Comments | On appeal from [2003] EWCA Civ 1188 and [2005] EWCA Civ 1219. |
| Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |