Last Updated: Friday, 19 January 2018, 17:46 GMT

Ming Shan Lin, aka Allen Lin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Attorney General of the United States of America

Publisher United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Publication Date 12 August 1996
Type of Decision 95-3756
Cite as Ming Shan Lin, aka Allen Lin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Attorney General of the United States of America, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 12 August 1996, available at: http://www.refworld.org/cases,USA_CA_8,3ae6b6ba18.html [accessed 21 January 2018]
Comments Submitted: 26 July, 1996; Filed: 12 August, 1996
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

Ming Shan Lin, also known as Allen Lin, Petitioner, v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service; Dean A. Hove, Acting
District Director, U.S.I.N.S.; Janet Reno, Attorney General
of the United States of America, Respondents.
No. 95-3756 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
July 26, 1996, Submitted
August 12, 1996, Filed

Prior History:

Petition for Review from the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. A72 969 040.

Disposition:

The decision of the Board is affirmed and the petition for review is dismissed.

Counsel:

For MING SHAN LIN, aka Allen Lin, Petitioner: Pamela J. Waggoner, Minneapolis, MN.

For IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, DEAN A. HOVE, Acting District Director, U.S.I.N.S., JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States of America, Respondents: Richard Soli, District Counsel, U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Bloomington, MN. Robert L. Bombaugh, Ellen Sue Shapiro, David V. Bernal, Joseph F. Ciolino, James A. Hunolt, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC.

Judges:

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Ming Shan Lin seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming a deportation order issued in the immigration court. The Board denied petitioner's application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed and the petition for review is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Search Refworld